Third target (corona_PLpro_v2)

Message boards : News : Third target (corona_PLpro_v2)
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Natalia
Project administrator
Project developer

Send message
Joined: 9 Oct 20
Posts: 114
Credit: 381,477
RAC: 210
Message 475 - Posted: 29 Jan 2021, 10:21:40 UTC

Hello everyone!

We are glad to announce work on the third target: PLpro_v2, the same protein with another catalytic active site.
We resume task generation with a new validator. It was implemented to automate result check which caused some delays before.

Thank you all for supporting the project!
ID: 475 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[PUGLIA]kidkidkid3

Send message
Joined: 26 Oct 20
Posts: 4
Credit: 1,103,444
RAC: 6,115
Message 478 - Posted: 29 Jan 2021, 12:33:36 UTC - in response to Message 475.  
Last modified: 29 Jan 2021, 12:34:26 UTC

Hi,
server with more than 39.000 Curie's wu don't release anything.
It's a my problem ?
Thanks in advance.
K.
ID: 478 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
JagDoc

Send message
Joined: 24 Oct 20
Posts: 3
Credit: 2,492,674
RAC: 34,353
Message 479 - Posted: 29 Jan 2021, 12:57:56 UTC - in response to Message 475.  

One of my host got 35 WUs all are valid.
Other host got 16 WUs all are pending.
And now i get no new work on both.
ID: 479 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Natalia
Project administrator
Project developer

Send message
Joined: 9 Oct 20
Posts: 114
Credit: 381,477
RAC: 210
Message 480 - Posted: 29 Jan 2021, 14:13:18 UTC

The server experiences a new unexpected problem with giving out tasks. We are working at it!
ID: 480 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[PUGLIA]kidkidkid3

Send message
Joined: 26 Oct 20
Posts: 4
Credit: 1,103,444
RAC: 6,115
Message 481 - Posted: 29 Jan 2021, 15:22:28 UTC - in response to Message 480.  

All done ! Thanks a lot.
K.
ID: 481 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
IanFoulkes

Send message
Joined: 23 Jan 21
Posts: 3
Credit: 524,027
RAC: 42
Message 482 - Posted: 29 Jan 2021, 16:17:17 UTC - in response to Message 475.  

Thank you Natalia,

Crunching now :)

onwards and upwards
Keep safe every one
ID: 482 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
robertmiles

Send message
Joined: 3 Nov 20
Posts: 23
Credit: 100,194
RAC: 992
Message 483 - Posted: 29 Jan 2021, 20:43:58 UTC

You might mention whether any fourth target is planned.
ID: 483 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Aurum
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Jan 21
Posts: 73
Credit: 33,730,562
RAC: 348,467
Message 484 - Posted: 30 Jan 2021, 8:12:36 UTC

Please add Target=corona_PLpro_v2 to the Project Status list so we can see how fast we rip through it :-)
ID: 484 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Philip C Swift [Gridcoin]

Send message
Joined: 20 Dec 20
Posts: 5
Credit: 115,863
RAC: 31
Message 485 - Posted: 30 Jan 2021, 8:47:37 UTC - in response to Message 475.  

Well done with the new validator :-) 'All good things come in time'
ID: 485 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Eternum

Send message
Joined: 7 Nov 20
Posts: 1
Credit: 92,821
RAC: 455
Message 486 - Posted: 30 Jan 2021, 14:03:06 UTC - in response to Message 480.  

Still not getting new tasks after the last suspension:

1/30/2021 8:59:37 AM | SiDock@home | Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
1/30/2021 8:59:37 AM | SiDock@home | Requesting new tasks for CPU
1/30/2021 8:59:38 AM | SiDock@home | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
1/30/2021 8:59:38 AM | SiDock@home | No tasks sent
1/30/2021 8:59:38 AM | SiDock@home | Project requested delay of 7 seconds
ID: 486 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Aurum
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Jan 21
Posts: 73
Credit: 33,730,562
RAC: 348,467
Message 487 - Posted: 30 Jan 2021, 14:31:37 UTC

ID: 487 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Aurum
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Jan 21
Posts: 73
Credit: 33,730,562
RAC: 348,467
Message 491 - Posted: 30 Jan 2021, 15:05:07 UTC

I'm seeing more of the VIs but I'm also seeing that some Validated on windows. Maybe it's par for the course.
ID: 491 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
laplume

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 21
Posts: 5
Credit: 309
RAC: 0
Message 495 - Posted: 31 Jan 2021, 7:07:43 UTC
Last modified: 31 Jan 2021, 7:09:11 UTC

Hello,
Weird things happening here.
Stopped laptop yesterday with WU at 17%. Turned it on just now and all the tasks are beginning from 0%. Currently running
RxDock on BOINC v1.00
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu


Any clues?

Rgds
ID: 495 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
hoarfrost
Project administrator
Project developer

Send message
Joined: 11 Oct 20
Posts: 67
Credit: 4,814,588
RAC: 35,813
Message 496 - Posted: 31 Jan 2021, 8:12:26 UTC - in response to Message 495.  

... Stopped laptop yesterday with WU at 17%. Turned it on just now and all the tasks are beginning from 0%. ...

Hello laplume!

Compuations performed without checkpoints and after BOINC restart, computations start from zero. Thank you for participation!
ID: 496 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
laplume

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 21
Posts: 5
Credit: 309
RAC: 0
Message 497 - Posted: 31 Jan 2021, 8:26:53 UTC - in response to Message 496.  

Ok, noted.
Thanks for reply.

Rgds
ID: 497 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
PMH_UK

Send message
Joined: 23 Dec 20
Posts: 13
Credit: 116,451
RAC: 615
Message 498 - Posted: 31 Jan 2021, 11:57:53 UTC - in response to Message 497.  

Check if your system can hibernate, may need to enable in settings.
That way tasks should resume when turning back on.

Paul.
ID: 498 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Aurum
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Jan 21
Posts: 73
Credit: 33,730,562
RAC: 348,467
Message 499 - Posted: 31 Jan 2021, 13:31:56 UTC - in response to Message 496.  

Compuations performed without checkpoints and after BOINC restart, computations start from zero.
Checkpointing needs to be high on your To Do List.
ID: 499 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
IanFoulkes

Send message
Joined: 23 Jan 21
Posts: 3
Credit: 524,027
RAC: 42
Message 505 - Posted: 1 Feb 2021, 19:19:44 UTC - in response to Message 499.  

Check points are under 'options > computing preferences > Request task check point' i have mine set to every 180 seconds, if i have a power outage or a PC crash i could lose 1h05m computing on one work unit without checkpoints, but spread over the 32 cores ( 32 running work units at almost completion 99%) its a day and a half of lost work :( so having mine set to 180seconds i would lose about 1h30min computing time worsted case scenario,

obviously with some computers which have a high clock frequency and less cores .. lets say work units take 32min and have 8 cores you would only lose 4 hours of work (with no check points), but again this is lost computing time... so a ball park ' Request task check point' set at every 300 seconds would be OK (40minits of computing time lost), im sure some one will have a formula or something :)
ID: 505 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
robertmiles

Send message
Joined: 3 Nov 20
Posts: 23
Credit: 100,194
RAC: 992
Message 506 - Posted: 1 Feb 2021, 19:51:26 UTC - in response to Message 505.  

Check points are under 'options > computing preferences > Request task check point' i have mine set to every 180 seconds, if i have a power outage or a PC crash i could lose 1h05m computing on one work unit without checkpoints, but spread over the 32 cores ( 32 running work units at almost completion 99%) its a day and a half of lost work :( so having mine set to 180seconds i would lose about 1h30min computing time worsted case scenario,

obviously with some computers which have a high clock frequency and less cores .. lets say work units take 32min and have 8 cores you would only lose 4 hours of work (with no check points), but again this is lost computing time... so a ball park ' Request task check point' set at every 300 seconds would be OK (40minits of computing time lost), im sure some one will have a formula or something :)

That works for BOINC applications that have checkpointing written into the program, CMdock doesn't, so it won't work for CMdock.
ID: 506 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : News : Third target (corona_PLpro_v2)

©2021 SiDock@home Team