Message boards :
Number crunching :
Munin stats for sidock
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 20 Mar 21 Posts: 4 Credit: 203,256 RAC: 0 |
Oh hai there: Just putting this here: https://munin.kiska.pw/munin/sidock-day.html And asking if the Formula BOINC sprint is murdering the server? As evidenced here by the longer than expected execution time of server_status.php |
Send message Joined: 13 Jan 21 Posts: 76 Credit: 38,846,214 RAC: 1 |
The Formula BOINC race was announced on 03/18/2021 11:00 (UTC) and began 03/19/2021 11:00 (UTC). Some contestants begin bunkering where they down load as many WUs as they can finagle and start running them but they don't return them until after the race starts on 3/19 at 11:00 UTC. So if your graph is in UTC then it makes sense. Returns are way down before race day and In Progress is up. Then when the starting gun goes off they dump all their completed WUs and rts spikes while inProgress drops down to normal again. |
Send message Joined: 13 Jan 21 Posts: 76 Credit: 38,846,214 RAC: 1 |
Looking at the longer term charts I don't understand why there are so many more Returns than InProgress??? https://munin.kiska.pw/munin/Munin-Node/Munin-Node/results_sidock.html |
Send message Joined: 24 Oct 20 Posts: 10 Credit: 20,268,477 RAC: 0 |
Looking at the longer term charts I don't understand why there are so many more Returns than InProgress???rts is Ready To Send |
Send message Joined: 20 Mar 21 Posts: 4 Credit: 203,256 RAC: 0 |
Who is hammering this poor server root@vultr:/usr/share/munin/plugins# time ./sidock multigraph results_sidock rts.value 22612 inProgress.value 55574 multigraph workunits_sidock validation.value 9 assimilation.value 0 deletion.value 21 deletion_result.value 42 multigraph transitioner_sidock backlog.value 0.00027777777777778 real 0m17.584s user 0m0.172s sys 0m0.044s It took 17 seconds to grab that... |
Send message Joined: 13 Jan 21 Posts: 76 Credit: 38,846,214 RAC: 1 |
Oh, there's key on the bottom of the second page that is not on the first page. In that case I don't see why you think they might be having server problems. SiDock is doing much better than last month for the BAMstats race. I've yet to see them run out of work this week. |
Send message Joined: 13 Jan 21 Posts: 76 Credit: 38,846,214 RAC: 1 |
Who is hammering this poor server I have two suggestions as to who is hammering the server: 1. BOINCers that are running more than one project but have set Resource for SiDock much higher than their other projects so it polls the server far more often than necessary to get a mere 2 WUs per thread, and 2. Bunkerers that use multiple clients to pretend to have more computers than they actually have and the app_config command <ncpus>N</ncpus> to pretend to have more CPUs than they actually have to suck down more WUs than they can actually run. |
Send message Joined: 30 Jan 21 Posts: 2 Credit: 10,712,302 RAC: 0 |
Oh and not 100's of Users with 100's of threads requesting work..(since we only get 2 per thread [~2 hours worth]). |
Send message Joined: 20 Mar 21 Posts: 4 Credit: 203,256 RAC: 0 |
It seems that we have returned to stable service? |
Send message Joined: 3 Nov 20 Posts: 19 Credit: 1,844,093 RAC: 0 |
It seems that we have returned to stable service? Possible reasons: 1) Longer WUs = fewer connections to project server 2) All bunkers have been fully uploaded 2) FB Sprint is going to finish and some users are leaving |
©2024 SiDock@home Team