Message boards :
News :
New application: CurieMarieDock
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 3 Nov 20 Posts: 19 Credit: 1,844,093 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 30 Oct 20 Posts: 57 Credit: 9,112,528 RAC: 0 |
It looks like CurieDock is slower than RxDock on Linux.That is my conclusion too, having completed over 100 total (about equal of each) on two different Ubuntu machines, one Intel and one Ryzen. |
Send message Joined: 24 Oct 20 Posts: 12 Credit: 7,271,761 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 3 Nov 20 Posts: 19 Credit: 1,844,093 RAC: 0 |
That is my conclusion too, having completed over 100 total (about equal of each) on two different Ubuntu machines, one Intel and one Ryzen. Now average processing rates are changed and CurieDock is the faster one... |
Send message Joined: 30 Oct 20 Posts: 57 Credit: 9,112,528 RAC: 0 |
Now average processing rates are changed and CurieDock is the faster one... Yes, I see that too. Good work. |
Send message Joined: 3 Nov 20 Posts: 41 Credit: 1,803,270 RAC: 3,555 |
Does CurieMarieDock have checkpoints? I saw no sign than RxDock does; it can run for half an hour without writing a checkpoint, If it doesn't have checkpoints, are the future tasks expected to be significantly longer than the current ones? If so, expect users in areas with less reliable power to drop out of the project when they start getting the longer tasks. And probably also users who don't want to leave their computers running overnight. If you're not familiar enough with the application source code to add checkpoints, you could try the virtual machine method of adding checkpoints. The RNA World BOINC project hasn't created any new workunits for months, but the last 30 are still running. http://www.rnaworld.de/rnaworld/ The virtual machine has checkpoints, although the application program doesn't. |
Send message Joined: 9 Oct 20 Posts: 185 Credit: 2,759,569 RAC: 3,343 |
Does CurieMarieDock have checkpoints? I saw no sign than RxDock does; it can run for half an hour without writing a checkpoint, Thank you for the feedback! The tasks will be of the same length. Also, CurieMarieDock runs faster, so they will finish faster. We hope this will more or less eliminate the need for checkpoints. We use BOINC Wrapper, and the main problem is, there are either checkpoints or correct suspending of tasks/project by the client. The latter feature is highly demanded. |
Send message Joined: 3 Nov 20 Posts: 41 Credit: 1,803,270 RAC: 3,555 |
[snip] Thank you for the feedback! The tasks will be of the same length. Also, CurieMarieDock runs faster, so they will finish faster. We hope this will more or less eliminate the need for checkpoints. We use BOINC Wrapper, and the main problem is, there are either checkpoints or correct suspending of tasks/project by the client. The latter feature is highly demanded. You may need to explain how to use the latter feature, then. I'd expect rather few users who haven't already used BOINC for years to already know, |
Send message Joined: 9 Oct 20 Posts: 185 Credit: 2,759,569 RAC: 3,343 |
I mean the suspend options with buttons in BOINC Manager or from command line, boinccmd --project URL suspend It seems many people are using them. BOINC Manager keeps suspended tasks in memory, so the work is not lost until BOINC/computer is not stopped. Yes, ideally there would be checkpoints too (they are automated and do not require user's actions). Maybe we find a solution one day. |
Send message Joined: 26 Oct 20 Posts: 1 Credit: 9,170,024 RAC: 0 |
Hi folks! Update: New application (CurieMarieDock) need a glibc version 2.27 or higher! As we see, most Linux computers meet these requirements. Bad news for me. My machines are all running openSUSE Leap 15.2 and this currently only offers glibc 2.26. So I can only run RxDock. Are there any considerations to change the dependency from glibc 2.27? Is there an benefit of glibc 2.27? Greetings Ritschie |
Send message Joined: 10 Dec 20 Posts: 1 Credit: 1,122,885 RAC: 3,812 |
I had the same problem, all "Curie" are failing because missing glibc 2.27. I'm running OpenSuse Leap 15.2 11:38:27 (30909): wrapper: running /home/cfjh/boinc/slots/27/build/cmdock (-r target.prm -p "/home/cfjh/boinc/slots/27/data/scripts/dock.prm" -f htvs.ptc -i ligands.sdf -o docking_out) /home/cfjh/boinc/slots/27/build/cmdock: /lib64/libm.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.27' not found (required by /home/cfjh/boinc/slots/27/build/libcuriedock.so.0) Any hints? |
Send message Joined: 3 Nov 20 Posts: 19 Credit: 1,844,093 RAC: 0 |
Any hints? Exclude CurieDock and run RxDock only. |
Send message Joined: 3 Jan 21 Posts: 24 Credit: 30,963,324 RAC: 104 |
Ritschie wrote: hoarfrost wrote:I am using openSUSE Leap 15.2 too. But I can run CurieMarieDock just fine, due to a hack which I implemented earlier for a Universe@home speedup. I posted the hack in "Questions and Answers : Unix/Linux : GLIBC_2.27 Req".Hi folks! Update: New application (CurieMarieDock) need a glibc version 2.27 or higher! As we see, most Linux computers meet these requirements.Bad news for me. My machines are all running openSUSE Leap 15.2 and this currently only offers glibc 2.26. So I can only run RxDock. Are there any considerations to change the dependency from glibc 2.27? Ritschie wrote: Is there an benefit of glibc 2.27?As far as I can tell from the 2.27 release plan, there is nothing interesting in it; no major feature, and no fix which a distributor wouldn't backport if strictly needed as a hotfix. |
Send message Joined: 13 Jan 21 Posts: 76 Credit: 38,846,214 RAC: 1 |
QuChemPedIA had problems getting checkpointing to work at first. Keep trying we need it every ten minutes not every hour.Does CurieMarieDock have checkpoints?Thank you for the feedback! The tasks will be of the same length. Also, CurieMarieDock runs faster, so they will finish faster. We hope this will more or less eliminate the need for checkpoints. We use BOINC Wrapper, and the main problem is, there are either checkpoints OR correct suspending of tasks/project by the client. The latter feature is highly demanded. BTW, I will never run a BOINC project in VirtualCatBox. You have a very nice native Linux ap, please don't ruin it by putting in a virtual box. I have no idea what you mean by your OR statement. If a WU is suspended it restarts from the last checkpoint. If you have no checkpoints then it restarts from the beginning. |
Send message Joined: 30 Oct 20 Posts: 57 Credit: 9,112,528 RAC: 0 |
I have no idea what you mean by your OR statement. If a WU is suspended it restarts from the last checkpoint. If you have no checkpoints then it restarts from the beginning. You are probably using "leave application in memory"? In that case, you don't need checkpoints if you don't reboot. But BOINC wrapper apparently implements one or the other, but not both. |
Send message Joined: 13 Jan 21 Posts: 76 Credit: 38,846,214 RAC: 1 |
Seriously?I have no idea what you mean by your OR statement. If a WU is suspended it restarts from the last checkpoint. If you have no checkpoints then it restarts from the beginning. "...there are either checkpoints OR correct suspending of tasks/project by the client." |
Send message Joined: 25 Oct 20 Posts: 3 Credit: 391,459 RAC: 0 |
Hello everyone! Without installing MS Visual C++ Redistributable for Visual Studio all my tasks failed on my notebook. After installing it they seems to run. Here is an example of the error: https://www.sidock.si/sidock/result.php?resultid=10671101 |
©2024 SiDock@home Team