Posts by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome

1) Message boards : News : Vote for the next target! (Message 2202) Posted 12 Feb 2024 by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 Post: I'm really impressed to see that 354 people did vote, this is great !
2) Message boards : News : Vote for the next target! (Message 2182) Posted 28 Jan 2024 by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 Post: Already 200 votes, I'm impressed :) Boinc is not dead ! ;)
3) Message boards : News : Project status: December 2023 (Message 2156) Posted 27 Dec 2023 by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 Post: News are always welcome ! Merry Christmas and happy holidays - if you have any ;)
4) Message boards : News : Target # 22: corona_RdRp_v2 (Message 1920) Posted 21 Jan 2023 by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 Post: Thanks for the info. So far I got another one that ended successfully but it took 1 day 14 hours to complete. And I have another one going the same way.
5) Message boards : News : Target # 22: corona_RdRp_v2 (Message 1887) Posted 19 Jan 2023 by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 Post: + I confirm the other tasks completed last max 2h30 on that small host.
6) Message boards : News : Target # 22: corona_RdRp_v2 (Message 1883) Posted 18 Jan 2023 by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 Post: Mmm I couldn't find how to "restart" a task, I tried to suspend it and let it run again, but it seemed to continue the same way, so I cancelled it :/ Thanks for the answer anyway.
7) Message boards : News : Target # 22: corona_RdRp_v2 (Message 1880) Posted 18 Jan 2023 by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 Post: I have a small host running this task for more than 3 days and claiming to be at 43% with a 1 day left deadline, in theory more than 4 days of calculation left : is it worth letting it run ? will it get credited (if it ends) ?
8) Message boards : News : Targets six, seven, eight (Message 1321) Posted 19 Oct 2021 by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 Post: We aim to release a version for Mac OS, hopefully soon. Thanks for the update, hope the soon is soon :)
9) Message boards : News : Targets six, seven, eight (Message 1258) Posted 1 Oct 2021 by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 Post: Hello Natalia, will you ever consider to port for macOS again ? the previous versions were working fine, and then you completely stopped masOS application :(
10) Questions and Answers : Macintosh : Status of CurieMarieDock on BOINC + zipped input, checkpoints and progress bar on Mac (Message 1257) Posted 1 Oct 2021 by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 Post: And moreover : why was macOS discontinued when it was supported for "CurieMarieDock on BOINC + zipped input" and "CurieMarieDock on BOINC" ? You failed to implement checkpoints and progress bar and then nobody else cared ? It's a pity :(
11) Message boards : Number crunching : Tasks don't suspend (Message 890) Posted 5 May 2021 by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 Post: Unfortunately this problem was never solved on macOS :(
12) Message boards : Number crunching : Exporting of Stats (Message 860) Posted 2 May 2021 by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 Post: Thanks for the update !
13) Message boards : Number crunching : Exporting of Stats (Message 856) Posted 2 May 2021 by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 Post: Stat cannot be read by https://statseb.boinc-af.org/ neither since 25/04, I also suppose this is due to the server migration ? Hopefully they will be back soon...
14) Questions and Answers : Macintosh : Work units for Mac (Message 814) Posted 23 Apr 2021 by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 Post: I found a new issue on macOS : the tasks do not suspend. If I tell boinc to suspend processing globally, boinc "thinks" all is suspended but the tasks actually continue to run ! I will try to fix that, it is an old bug :) Thanks ! Note that this only happens with Curie tasks, the RxDock do suspend properly. Hi Natalia I recently did again some SiDock on my Mac and there is still the same behavior : I have several projects running at the same time, boinc decided to suspend the sidock tasks because there were other tasks to move to high priority run (deadlines...) and I realized the sidock that were clearly in wait state in the boinc manager actually continued to run in memory... If it can help, now I have some normally crunching sidocks at the moment (together with wanless tasks and QChemPedIA VB tasks) and as you can see in the process monitor all is nicely sorted "inside" boinc process, itself being "inside" the boinc manager, however in my CPU monitoring tool (iStats Menu) they appear "outside" of boinc Normally in iStat I only have one row called "boinc manager" with the sum of all CPU used by all the boinc tasks running, not with "some of the boinc tasks out of that sum". So I think there is "something wrong" in the way boinc is running these sidock tasks, probably due to how these tasks are "self declared to the OS" inside of the code of the sidock curie application.
15) Message boards : Number crunching : CurieMarieDock on BOINC v1.00 windows_x86_64 IMMEDIATE CRASH (Message 326) Posted 21 Dec 2020 by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 Post: Thanks for the answer, I tried to start searching on "how to install glibc 2.27 debian" (I'm no linux expert) then I found things like this and thought OMG... so since this small VM is "boinc only" I decided to upgrade to Debian 10, and a few "sudo apt" commands later it was done (cool and fast update process for a major release by the way !!), and now curie is not failing anymore ! Thanks !
16) Questions and Answers : Macintosh : Work units for Mac (Message 325) Posted 21 Dec 2020 by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 Post: I found a new issue on macOS : the tasks do not suspend. If I tell boinc to suspend processing globally, boinc "thinks" all is suspended but the tasks actually continue to run ! I will try to fix that, it is an old bug :) Thanks ! Note that this only happens with Curie tasks, the RxDock do suspend properly.
17) Message boards : Number crunching : CurieMarieDock on BOINC v1.00 windows_x86_64 IMMEDIATE CRASH (Message 317) Posted 20 Dec 2020 by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 Post: Same for me a linux host, all the Curie tasks are failing and all the RxDock are OK. But the error message is quite different. <core_client_version>7.14.2</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 195 (0xc3, -61)</message> <stderr_txt> 18:22:37 (22547): wrapper (7.17.26016): starting 18:22:38 (22547): wrapper (7.17.26016): starting 18:22:38 (22547): wrapper: running /var/lib/boinc-client/slots/4/build/cmdock (-r target.prm -p "/var/lib/boinc-client/slots/4/data/scripts/dock.prm" -f htvs.ptc -i ligands.sdf -o docking_out) /var/lib/boinc-client/slots/4/build/cmdock: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.27' not found (required by /var/lib/boinc-client/slots/4/build/libcuriedock.so.0) 18:22:39 (22547): $PWD/build/cmdock exited; CPU time 0.000000 18:22:39 (22547): app exit status: 0x1 18:22:39 (22547): called boinc_finish(195) </stderr_txt> ]]> https://www.sidock.si/sidock/result.php?resultid=170157
18) Message boards : News : Transition to production project (Message 261) Posted 16 Dec 2020 by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 Post: Accounts transferred, with statistics, teams, even the messages on the board ! I'm quite impressed, good job ! Last thing missing : new tasks :)
19) Questions and Answers : Macintosh : Work units for Mac (Message 231) Posted 7 Dec 2020 by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 Post: I found a new issue on macOS : the tasks do not suspend. If I tell boinc to suspend processing globally, boinc "thinks" all is suspended but the tasks actually continue to run !
20) Questions and Answers : Macintosh : Work units for Mac (Message 222) Posted 5 Dec 2020 by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 Post: Yep they didn't crash from the start, they are running now, thanks !

Next 20

Posts by [AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005